When replacing an illustration, review every piece of text that describes or depends on it. Compare the new image with the caption, alternative description where used, labels, and surrounding explanation, then approve those elements together in the intended output.
Identify what the replacement actually changes
An illustration replacement can preserve the broad subject while changing details that matter to the explanation. A diagram may reverse the order of its panels, a new crop may remove a label, or a regenerated scene may show a different action. Begin by comparing the old and new versions against the image's purpose in the chapter.
For a gardening guide, a replacement picture of a seedling might show roots that were hidden in the previous image. That could improve one explanation while making an old caption inaccurate. Record the meaningful differences before deciding which text can remain. A similar visual style does not prove that the informational content is unchanged.
Gather the text attached to the image
Collect the caption, figure title, embedded labels, alternative description where the format uses one, and any nearby sentence that refers to the visual. Check references elsewhere in the chapter as well. A phrase such as the three stages shown below can become wrong when the new image contains only two panels.
Keep these items associated with the image's stable slot or figure identity rather than just its filename. Filenames often change during export, and the same image may appear in several versions of the book. The relationship should make it possible to find the relevant text when a contributor replaces the asset later.

Rewrite descriptions from the final visible content
Inspect the actual selected image before updating its description. State what the reader needs to understand in the context of the passage. Avoid carrying over details from an earlier draft, and do not describe features that the new crop hides. An automated description may help identify candidates, but a person must verify what the image supports.
Distinguish visible information from an interpretation supplied by the surrounding text. If the illustration cannot show why a plant is struggling, its description should not invent that cause merely because the chapter discusses it. Keep explanatory claims in the appropriate prose and ensure that the visual genuinely supports the comparison the author wants to make.
Give captions and alternative descriptions appropriate roles
A caption may explain why the reader is seeing the illustration or connect it with a concept in the chapter. An alternative description, when used by the output format, helps convey relevant visual information through another route. They can overlap, but copying one into the other without review may omit the detail needed to understand the image.
Decide what information is essential for the reader's task and how the book provides it. A simple decorative element and a detailed process diagram require different treatment. Check the current guidance and capabilities of the chosen format and production tools rather than assuming that a field in the editing interface will survive every export in the same way.

Review instructions that rely on position or color
Replacement images often change spatial language. Left, right, above, below, and the red line can become inaccurate after a new composition or color treatment. Search for those dependencies around the figure and inspect the passages manually. A sentence can remain grammatically correct while directing the reader to the wrong feature.
Use stable labels where they make the explanation clearer, and ensure the labels actually appear in the image or accompanying text. Do not repair a confusing instruction by adding an identifier that the reader cannot find. Test the explanation by following it with the new visual in front of you, without relying on memory of the old version.
Approve the image and its text in the export
Export the updated material and review the illustration with its associated text. Confirm that the caption belongs to the right figure, the intended description is present where supported, and the surrounding explanation still makes sense after layout changes. Check each affected format because a print replacement and an ebook replacement may use different crops or arrangements.
Preserve the new artwork's origin and review record as well. KDP's content guidance assigns responsibility for published material to the publisher, including generated images. Replacing an asset updates that record; it does not inherit every conclusion from the previous image. Approve the complete figure package only when the visual, its descriptions, and the chapter's claims agree.
Frequently asked questions
Clear answers for this publishing decision.
Can I retain the old description if the subject is unchanged?
Only after comparing the actual images. A new crop, panel order, label, or action can change the information even when both illustrations depict the same general subject.
Should the caption and alternative description always match?
Review their purposes in the selected format. They may share information, but the caption can explain relevance while another description conveys visual details needed to understand the figure.
What if an AI tool writes the replacement description?
Check it against the selected asset and the reader’s task. Remove invented details and verify that it describes the final crop rather than an earlier image or the intended scene in the prompt.
How wide does the full-wrap cover need to be, and how thick is the spine?
The cover width is back cover plus spine plus front cover plus bleed on both sides; the spine width is the final even page count multiplied by the paper-specific factor Amazon publishes, so the cover cannot be sized before the interior page count is final.
Prepare the cover in a book project