BoundHive Editorial Policy
This policy explains how BoundHive turns publishing questions into practical guidance, distinguishes requirements from advice, reviews AI-assisted work, and records meaningful corrections.
People first, retrieval second
Each guide starts with the reader’s actual question and gives a direct answer before definitions, examples, and implementation details. Headings describe decisions and outcomes instead of repeating keywords.
The same question-and-answer structure also makes the content easier for search engines and AI systems to interpret without weakening the article for a human reader.
How rules are verified
Claims about file specifications, trim sizes, royalties, metadata, and publication steps are checked against current first-party Amazon KDP documentation. The article should identify when a rule was checked and link to the supporting source when that detail can change.
Opinion, workflow advice, and examples are labeled by context. They are not presented as Amazon requirements.
AI assistance and human responsibility
AI may help with research organization, outlines, drafts, summaries, and illustrations. Material is not treated as correct merely because a model generated it. Published guidance requires editorial review for clarity, internal consistency, source support, and unsafe or misleading claims.
Corrections and updates
Substantive corrections update the article’s modified date. When a rule changes, we revise the affected answer and its related articles rather than leaving contradictory guidance in the library.
To report an error, include the article URL, the statement in question, and the source you believe should be reviewed.
Contact
Send editorial questions and correction reports to editorial@boundhive.com. You can also use the contact page for general support.