Loading BoundHive

Update Book Metadata After Removing a Digital Companion

After removing a digital companion, identify every task and claim that depended on it. Replace essential support inside the book or revise the task, then update the cover, description, and keywords to match the finished offering. Do not leave the reader expecting a file or service the edition no longer supplies.

Identify what the companion used to provide

List the removed files or online features and describe their role. A printable worksheet, an editable template, and a video demonstration solve different problems. Knowing that a download disappeared is less useful than knowing which part of the reader's activity depended on it.

Distinguish optional enrichment from essential support. A bonus example may be removed without changing the main learning sequence, while an exercise that requires a spreadsheet template may no longer be usable. Review the actual instructions instead of relying on the word bonus from an old marketing brief.

Trace dependencies through the manuscript

Search for references to downloads, access instructions, file names, and companion resources. Then read the affected activities for implicit dependencies. An instruction to enter figures into the prepared sheet may rely on the missing file even when it contains no link or download label.

Create a list of changes needed to make the book complete under its revised scope. Each dependency should lead to a deliberate action: include the necessary material in the book, redesign the activity, replace the resource, or remove the unsupported task. Do not treat deletion of the link as completion of the content revision.

Symbolic publishing workflow for trace dependencies through the manuscript
Trace dependencies through the manuscript

Rebuild the reader task before rewriting the promise

Test a representative activity using only the material that will remain available. If the reader now needs to draw a table or prepare a document manually, provide enough instruction to do that. Check whether the additional preparation changes the audience assumptions or the time the activity requires.

Keep the new method coherent with the rest of the book. A removed template can expose terminology, examples, or screenshots that no longer match the task. Revise those elements together so the replacement is a usable method rather than a patch that asks readers to reconstruct the missing companion themselves.

Review visible feature claims

Inspect the title, subtitle, cover text, description, and any images used to present the book. Remove or revise claims that imply the digital material is included. A small badge on the cover can preserve the old promise even after the description has been corrected.

Choose replacement wording from the actual revised content. If the book now includes printed worksheets, describe that feature accurately without implying editable files. KDP's metadata guidance calls for accurate representation, so the revised listing should communicate what the buyer receives rather than the history of what the author once planned.

Symbolic review checklist for review visible feature claims
Review visible feature claims

Reassess keywords and audience expectations

Review search phrases that depend on the removed feature, such as terms suggesting downloadable templates or a particular digital workflow. Determine whether each still describes the central content. The fact that the book discusses a tool does not establish that it includes a file for that tool.

Ask a reader unfamiliar with the revision what the complete listing leads them to expect. Compare that expectation with the current edition files and resource inventory. If they still assume a companion is included, investigate the wording or imagery that creates the impression instead of relying on a brief corrective sentence elsewhere.

Preserve the revised scope in the edition record

Record which companion was removed, how its essential functions were replaced, and which public claims changed. Keep the old resource history separate from the approved release package so an outdated link or badge does not return through a reused file.

Before export, inspect the final introduction, activities, resource section, and cover together. Confirm that the reader can complete the promised tasks under the new arrangement. This final reconciliation connects the metadata correction with the substantive book revision that makes the new promise accurate.

Frequently asked questions

Clear answers for this publishing decision.

Is removing the download link enough?

No. Check the tasks, examples, and public claims that depended on the resource. The book may need new instructions or replacement material before it works without the companion.

Can I keep template-related keywords if the book discusses templates?

Evaluate what the phrase implies to the intended reader and what the book actually supplies. Discussion of a template is different from providing an editable or downloadable template.

Should I preserve the old companion files?

Keep them in the editorial archive if they are useful for tracing the revision, but separate them from the approved release materials and clearly record their retired status.

Metadata and upload

What should the title, subtitle, description, and keywords look like before I upload?

Check the mechanical limits first, then make sure title, subtitle, categories, and description describe the same book for the same reader; a keyword is useful when it matches how that reader searches, not because it is popular.

Draft the listing fields in a book project

Get all of our updates directly to your inbox.
Sign up for our newsletter.

We could not save your subscription.