Use automatic hyphenation as a layout aid, then inspect its results in the final reading size. Pay particular attention to names, specialized terms, headings, and narrow columns, and make targeted corrections without confusing line-break behavior with meaningful hyphens in the text.
Distinguish line breaks from written punctuation
A hyphen that belongs in a compound word is part of the manuscript's wording. A hyphen used to divide a word at the end of a line serves a layout function. Keep those cases distinct when reviewing automated changes. Removing every visible hyphen can alter the text, while inserting ordinary hyphens to force line breaks can leave unwanted punctuation after the layout changes.
Use the authoring application's appropriate controls and consult its documentation for the actual behavior. The editorial goal is to preserve the words while improving the line endings. Record unusual decisions in the style notes so another contributor does not undo them through a broad search-and-replace operation.
Check the language and terminology assumptions
Review the language settings relevant to the text being laid out. A manuscript can contain names, borrowed words, or passages in another language that require separate attention. Do not assume the software's default settings understand every term merely because most ordinary paragraphs look acceptable.
Create a small list of words that deserve manual inspection, such as character names, invented locations, and technical vocabulary central to the book. Search for their occurrences and inspect the line endings in context. This is more reliable than approving the entire book from one page whose vocabulary happens to match the tool's ordinary expectations.

Inspect narrow and prominent text separately
Captions, tables, sidebars, and other narrow areas can produce more awkward breaks than the main body text. Headings are also prominent enough that an unfortunate split can disrupt the page's hierarchy. Review these areas explicitly instead of assuming the body paragraph settings produce equally good results everywhere.
Consider whether a particular text style should use a different treatment. A short caption may benefit from a modest wording adjustment, while a table label may need a wider column or a clearer label. Choose the correction that supports understanding rather than applying the same hyphenation setting indiscriminately to every kind of text.
Read the line ending and the next line together
A break can be mechanically plausible while making the word slow to recognize or briefly suggesting another meaning. Read the affected sentence at the intended size. Check whether the reader can follow it naturally without reconstructing a name or an important term across several visually crowded lines.
Look at consecutive line endings as a pattern as well. A paragraph with many closely spaced breaks can feel fragmented even when each individual break seems defensible. If the pattern is distracting, consider a targeted layout or wording adjustment while preserving the author's meaning. Avoid introducing new factual or stylistic changes solely to satisfy a visual preference without review.

Recheck after changes to the page geometry
A new trim size, margin, font, or text correction can change where words break. Treat earlier hyphenation approval as tied to the layout that was actually inspected. After a material change, revisit the sensitive words and text areas rather than assuming the previous corrections still behave as intended.
KDP's formatting resources distinguish preparation for the selected book format. Review the actual print or ebook output accordingly. A fixed print line break may not be an appropriate assumption for a digital reading experience that changes with the selected format or reading settings. Preserve the text and inspect how the output handles it.
Verify the exported manuscript rather than the editor view
Open the exported file and compare representative difficult pages with the source. Confirm that deliberate layout corrections survived and that no manual punctuation intended only for a previous line ending now appears in the middle of a word. Include opening pages, dense tables, and sections with unusual vocabulary in the review.
Save the relevant style and exception notes with the approved manuscript. Automatic hyphenation can reduce repetitive layout work, but the author or editor still decides whether the resulting text is readable and faithful to the intended wording. Approve the final output when the breaks support reading without introducing confusion or unintended textual changes.
Frequently asked questions
Clear answers for this publishing decision.
Should I remove all hyphens when fixing awkward line breaks?
No. Distinguish punctuation that belongs in the text from line-end division. Use the appropriate layout controls and review the actual word or compound before changing it.
Why do names need special attention?
A tool may apply rules that do not suit a particular name or invented term. Inspect those occurrences in the final layout instead of assuming ordinary-word behavior is reliable for every case.
When should I repeat the check?
Repeat the relevant review after changes that affect line lengths or text, such as margins, fonts, trim size, or late corrections. Inspect the exported file used for publication.
How do I get from an idea and a brief to an editable manuscript I can finish?
Write the brief first, generate a structure you can edit, then draft and revise the manuscript in reviewable sections so one change never overwrites work you already approved.
Start a book project from a brief